Chinese nigger gets slingshotted across the lot

Who needs safety regulations?


Submitted on Mar 26, 2018WTF
Points: 35


  • Mucho User FredGspotSanfordVet

    FredGspotSanford

    I'm putting one of these up in Diamond bar so I can get rid of all these Chinese fucks

    Like1STFU0
    #14698
    Mucho User makodragonVet

    makodragon

    Yeah, they will lflock to it like a bunch of slitty-eyed hamsters to wheel.

    Like3STFU0
    #127362
  • Mucho User BonoVet

    Bono

    Restore feature works, almost too good... heads up WayBack machine, we're about to hammer your shit

    Like0STFU0
    #177651
    Mucho User BILLYMAYSHEREVet

    BILLYMAYSHERE

    god damn.. already this site is 329times better than that fagfest crazyshit.. i mean, thats not a tall bar to clear but still

    Like0STFU0
    #177655
    Mucho User BarretVet

    Barret

    Can't believe its been 2 months already.

    Like0STFU0
    #183249
  • Mucho User BarretVet

    Barret

    Guy did it to himself, must have been part of the act

    Like0STFU0
    #177653
  • Mucho User Sealbasher2026Zucker

    Sealbasher2026

    its not fair to call asians "niggers" genetic data show Europeans (“whites”) and East Asians (including Chinese) are closer to each other than either group is to sub-Saharan Africans. This is measured by Fst (fixation index), which quantifies the proportion of genetic variation that is between populations rather than within them. Higher Fst = greater average genetic distance. Typical genome-wide pairwise Fst values from large datasets (e.g., HapMap / 1000 Genomes-style analyses):

    Europeans vs East Asians: ~0.11 (about 11%) Europeans vs sub-Saharan Africans (e.g., Yoruba): ~0.15 (about 15%) East Asians vs sub-Saharan Africans: ~0.19 (about 19%)

    So the Europe–East Asia distance is clearly smaller than either group’s distance to sub-Saharan Africans. Older multi-locus studies (protein, blood-group, and DNA markers) reached the same conclusion: the genetic distance between Europeans and Asians is significantly lower than the distances of either to Africans. know your facts you fucking moron

    Like2STFU0
    #183247
    Mucho User Sealbasher2026Zucker

    Sealbasher2026

    Furthermore the Nordic and the Mongoloid stand closer in the great racial tree than either does to the Negroid. Look at the skulls: the Nordic is dolichocephalic, long-headed and high-browed; the East Asian is brachycephalic yet still refined, with a cranial architecture that shares the same post-African branch. The Negro skull remains more primitive—prognathous, lower-vaulted, closer to the ancestral African stock from which the higher races departed tens of thousands of years ago. Blood and bone confirm it. The Aryan and the Mongoloid share a more recent common racial origin after the great migration out of the dark continent; the Negroid stayed behind and stagnated. That is why the European and the Chinese measure closer in the racial hierarchy than either does to the black.

    Like1STFU0
    #183248
    Mucho User Sealbasher2026Zucker

    Sealbasher2026

    >>c183248

    Thus the measurements of skull and blood leave no room for doubt: the Nordic and the Mongoloid form a higher racial kinship, while the Negroid remains the more distant, primitive branch. In the final accounting of Nature’s hierarchy, the long-headed Aryan and the round-headed East Asian stand as cousins of the same elevated stock—while the Negro, alas, is merely a more distant relative one would rather not invite to the family reunion.

    Like1STFU0
    #183250
    Mucho User BarretVet

    Barret

    Oh yeah, Sealbasher exists. I almost forgot about that.

    Like0STFU1
    #183252